My family visit visa has been refused – what can I do?

A visit visa is available to someone who wants to come to the UK for less than 6 months and for many with relatives and friends in the UK, it’s a vital mechanism to allow family relationships to be maintained when people live in different places, either because they choose to do so or because, as London immigration appeal lawyers are only too aware, they cannot satisfy the UK’s stringent rules on family settlement. Since 2013, full rights of appeal for the refusal of a family visit visa have been unavailable, leaving applicants with a confusing array of options including either re-applying, or applying for Judicial Review of the refusal. An appeal is only available if you can engage Human Rights grounds. We would always recommend taking specialist legal advice from immigration solicitors with experience handling cases on the UK immigration rules on family settlement if you find yourself in this situation.

Is reapplying for a visit visa a waste of time – and money?

Reapplying for a visit visa can be a worthwhile exercise if you understand the reason the visit visa was refused and you are confident that you can address the problems that led to the refusal in the first place. It may be that evidence was missing from the original application, or the entry clearance officer who examined the original application has clearly overlooked evidence that was included. In these cases, it may be worth re-applying (or asking for a re-consideration). If you can show that it was the oversight of the entry clearance officer that led to the family visit visa application being rejected, it is also worth considering a request for a waiver of the fee for the new application.

When will reapplying be ineffective?

While re-applying or reconsideration may be the best approach to dealing with a family visit visa refusal, there will be situations when some kind of legal action will be more appropriate. If the visa was refused because the entry clearance officer felt the documentation provided was inadequate or from an unverifiable source, and you have no other documents to submit, reapplying will be a waste of time. Equally, in cases where the applicant has been refused entry to the UK for a specific period of time for some reason, or because there is a belief that the applicant is either not a genuine visitor or does not intend to return home, reapplying or reconsideration are unlikely to be effective.

When is it appropriate to appeal ‘on Human Rights grounds’?

Following the case of Baihinga it is understood by the best immigration solicitors that ‘Human Rights grounds’ include any case where the right to family life or private life is in play. While the Home Office does have the power to refuse visit visas, despite some arguments to the contrary, based on comments in the Charles case that the effects of the domestic law – the immigration rules – are foreseeable – it can be worth appealing on Human Rights grounds if you believe you can potentially succeed. Home Office guidance is narrow around Human Rights grounds and does not accord with the latest guidance form the Courts in the cases of Mostafa and Baihinga – and ultimately it is for the court to say whether someone has Human Rights grounds for an appeal, not the Home Office. There are still many ‘unknowns’ in visit visa appeals on Human Rights grounds. A solicitor with experience of article 8 Human Rights act immigration cases will be able to advise further on this.

Are there disadvantages to an appeal on Human Rights grounds?

The key disadvantage to embarking on an appeal on Human Rights grounds is that it can take time to get before the court – and the judge may then decide that you did not have a ‘Human Rights ground’ for appeal after all. You will have no way of recovering the time or the expenses you invested in the appeal and will have lost the chance of bringing Judicial Review proceedings.

How could Judicial Review help when my visit visa is refused?

For someone who has no realistic grounds of succeeding with a re-application or is unable to challenge a visit visa refusal by way of an appeal on Human Rights grounds, the alternative may be an application for Judicial Review. Although it is possible to do this without legal support, finding an immigration solicitor with experience of Judicial Review procedure and immigration will significantly increase your chances of a successful outcome. This is particularly so in cases of family visit visa refusals where there have yet to be any test cases to establish whether Judicial Review is available if an appeal on Human Rights grounds could be possible – or whether the appeal route must be exhausted before Judicial Review can be considered. Equally if there is some other reason, not related to Human Rights grounds, on which to base an action for Judicial Review, that may offer the answer.

OTS Solicitors are experienced immigration and human rights lawyers, highly recommended in the Legal 500 for both these areas of law. For questions about how to proceed if your visit visa has been refused, and expert legal advice and support, don’t hesitate to contact us, in confidence on 0203 959 9123.



Relevant People: 

For the best expert legal advice and outcome on your UK immigration application, contact OTS immigration solicitors on 0203 959 9123 or contact us online.


We are one of the UK’s top firms for immigration solicitors and civil liberties lawyers. We can advise on a broad range of immigration issues including Appeals and Refusals, Judicial Reviews, spouse visas, student visas, Work Permit Visas, Indefinite Leave to Remain, EEA Applications, Asylum and Human Rights, British Citizenship, All types of visas, Business Immigration Visas, Entrepreneur Visas and Investor Visas.

Our top immigration solicitors and lawyers are here to assist you.


Disclaimer: The information and comments on this page/site is made available free of charge and for educational and information purposes only. The information and comments do not amount to and are not intended to be adopted as legal advice to any individual or company. The use of this site should not be a substitute for specific legal advice, which we ask you to see our contact page or call our solicitors on 0203 959 9123.

By using this site you understand that there is no solicitor and client relationship between you/your company and the site owners or the firm. We make every effort to keep the published articles up-to-date and accurate, however the law changes very rapidly and the older the articles on this site, the more likely that the views in it have changed with the development of the law.