Refund policy on Appendix EU/Settled Status applications published

The cost of applying for a visa to live or work in the UK can be almost prohibitively expensive for many – as any UK immigration lawyer will tell you – and there does not appear to be any indication that immigration and visa fees are likely to reduce in the coming months especially with Brexit approaching. While the cost of applying for settled status for EU citizens is at the lower end of the scale, the UK Government has updated the fees regime with details of its approach to refunds.

The latest fees came into force in April 2018, and, as noted by EEA immigration solicitors, recent regulations on fees, the immigration and Nationality (Fees) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations and immigration and Nationality (Fees) (Amendment) (EU Exit) (No2) Regulations have expanded the existing rules to cover the new Brexit settled status application – now known as ‘Appendix EU’ for EU nationals wishing to remain in the UK, and associated conditions, and the Appendix EU fee scheme.

Appendix EU fee non-refundable

The key point to note from the latest regulations which come into force in early October is the determination that there will be no refunds in the case of an invalid Appendix EU application by an EU national. The fee of £65.00 per adult and £32.50 per child is waived for those with a permanent residence document, those with Indefinite Leave to Remain, and for children in care. However, because the costs of administering the Appendix EU scheme are greater than the cost of the application to the EU citizen, the UK Government has decided it will not refund in the case of an invalid application.

Valid Settled Status application 

Any EU citizen living in the UK and wishing to remain following Brexit can do so by applying for settled status. The scheme is not yet fully operational but is anticipated to be so following localised trials. In order to submit a valid application, the EU citizen must demonstrate that they fulfil a number of eligibility criteria, as follows:

- They must have applied online or used the assistive digital service

- They must pay the appropriate fee

- They must include proof of nationality and identity

- They must ‘enrol their facial image’

An invalid application will be rejected without a refund of the fee; a valid application that is refused for some reason will be open to administrative review, on payment of a fee of £80…

If you have any concerns about your immigration status as an EU citizen in the UK following Brexit, OTS Solicitors will be happy to help. Call us in confidence on 0203 959 9123 to discuss your situation and find out how we can support you.



Relevant People: 

For the best expert legal advice and outcome on your UK immigration application, contact OTS immigration solicitors on 0203 959 9123 or contact us online.


We are one of the UK’s top firms for immigration solicitors and civil liberties lawyers. We can advise on a broad range of immigration issues including Appeals and Refusals, Judicial Reviews, spouse visas, student visas, Work Permit Visas, Indefinite Leave to Remain, EEA Applications, Asylum and Human Rights, British Citizenship, All types of visas, Business Immigration Visas, Entrepreneur Visas and Investor Visas.

Our top immigration solicitors and lawyers are here to assist you.


Disclaimer: The information and comments on this page/site is made available free of charge and for educational and information purposes only. The information and comments do not amount to and are not intended to be adopted as legal advice to any individual or company. The use of this site should not be a substitute for specific legal advice, which we ask you to see our contact page or call our solicitors on 0203 959 9123.

By using this site you understand that there is no solicitor and client relationship between you/your company and the site owners or the firm. We make every effort to keep the published articles up-to-date and accurate, however the law changes very rapidly and the older the articles on this site, the more likely that the views in it have changed with the development of the law.